1.2
Short History
Milestones
|
Year
|
Events and scientists
|
| 1874 |
A prototype waste incineration plant for energy
started operating in Nottingham, Britain. |
| 1898 |
Waste-to-energy incineration started in Governor’s
Island, New York, U.S. |
| Early 1900’s |
Boom of incineration plants |
| 1935 |
40% of US waste was incinerated in 22 plants |
| 1945 |
Fallback of incineration plants |
| 1956 |
Clean Air Act in Britain |
| 1960’s |
Renewed opposition against waste incineration
|
| 1963 |
US shift to mass burning |
| 1967 |
Clean Air Act in US, close of 250 plants until
1980 |
| 1970’s |
The U.S. acquired European mass burn technologies,
which dominated her industry until the late 1980’s
First comprehensive
research on waste incineration systems and pyrolysis
units in the U.S.
|
| 1981 |
Public Utility Regulation and Policy Act to promote
MSW (municipal solid waste) power in the US |
| 1990 |
The EPA recognized MSW power as a renewable fuel |
Resources
and supplies being widely available, the Mayan Indians
of Central America did not take much care about discarding
all their waste. They had dumps, which occasionally
exploded and burnt as the result of the accumulated
methane. In Europe, the first municipal landfill was
established by the Greeks in Athens, 500 BC. The only
restriction was that waste should be dumped at least
a mile away from the city.
Land-filling
was, however, not so common. Historical evidence shows
that people of the past extensively made use of recycling.
In early times everything that could be mended was repaired
or reused, while the rest was either fed to livestock
or used as compost. If something was of no use anymore
then it was burnt.
Waste
began to be a true problem with the onset of urbanization.
The growing population numbers and their settling in
big cities increased the volume of waste. By 1400, for
example, the garbage pile was so high outside the gates
of Paris that it was a potential problem when defending
the city.
Although
the Roman Empire maintained a garbage collection service,
there was no organized waste collection until the late
19th century, which led to sanitation problems.
Unmanaged and untreated waste, which was often improperly
discarded – it was not uncommon that even human waste
was simply thrown out of the window – stimulated various
diseases (plague, cholera, typhoid fever etc.). The
lack of waste management obviously resulted in a generally
low level of public health and hygiene. No wonder
that as early as 1842 a report made a connection between
diseases and the state of the environment, hence marking
the commencement of the age of sanitation.
By the
end of the 19th century, industrialization
and the launch of large-scale manufacturing made it
clear that the amount of waste should somehow be managed.
For this reason more and more incineration plants were
put into operation. The first prototype plant called
“the Destructor” was established in Nottingham, Britain,
1874. It was fed by a mixture of various wastes and
used for steam production in order to generate electricity.
The US history of waste-to-energy started some years
later in 1898, when an incineration plant in Governor’s
Island, New York was set up. Before the appearance of
the first incinerators much of the burning was accidental,
being the result of natural methane generation.
As the
number of incineration plants grew, so did opposition,
due to the significant amount of ash, dust and charred
paper discharged. Despite public resistance, by the
year 1935 the US, for example, burned 40% of her waste
at 22 incinerators. However steady rejection and the
change of economic situation finally led to the fallback
of waste incineration, which saw its lowest point in
1945. By no means was this a result of the propaganda
which was advertised throughout the 1940s: “waste helps
the enemy, conserve material”.
Though
generating an incredibly huge volume of waste, the post-war
period saw the increase of public awareness. Subsequently
there was a renewed and fierce opposition against incineration
in the 1960s. The change in attitude is also well represented
by the introduction of the Clean Air Act of 1956 in
England. The Act reduced the number of uncontrolled
open fires in households, thus changing the composition
of waste for disposal.
At the
same time when pollution control grew to be an increasing
concern for Europe, the U.S. Navy, Wheelabrator, and
Ogden acquired European mass burn technologies, which
dominated the U.S. industry until the late 1980’s. Although
there was also opposition from Americans, at the end
of 1963 the scarcity of landfills resulted in a shift
to mass burning, streaming 35 % of the waste to incinerators.
Shortly after that the US government introduced the
Clean Air Act of 1967. With its enactment, opposition
was no longer a nuisance but a real concern over environment.
As a result 250 plants were closed due to non-compliance
between 1965 and 1980. During this period the U.S. gained
much experience with researching waste incineration
systems, pyrolysis and the production of waste derived
fuels. Fuels derived from refuse, resulting from this
experimentation, were used in conventional coal fired
boilers. However, due to material handling problems,
these waste treatment operations also had to be closed
down by 1980.
In 1981
the US introduced the Public Utility Regulation and
Policy Act that urged public and private utilities to
purchase power from waste-to-energy plants in order
to promote the use of solid waste as a fuel in generating
electricity. It set a trend to propagate waste-to-energy
technologies, which is now gaining worldwide acceptance
in scientific circles.