3.
IMPLICATIONS
3.1
Energy Efficiency Implications
Looking
at the transport sector we can say that the actual efficiency
of an engine varies with design, size and running conditions.
The average efficiency of diesel and gasoline engines
under good condition is considered to be 30% and 20%
respectively.
The efficiency
of an engine running on producer gas is normally less
because the gas-air mixture has a lower energy density,
and there is other power losses associated with mixture
induction in engines. Theoretically, gasoline and diesel
engines operating on producer gas suffer a power loss
of 30% and 20 % respectively. In practice, considering
a wide range of producer gas quality, a power drop ranging
from 25 % to 60 % can be expected when a diesel or gasoline
engine is running on producer gas.
As far
as biogas is concerned the part that can be used for
energy production is methane. In combined heat and power
plants it is converted into electricity and heat with
an overall efficiency of about 80-90%. Because the chemical
reaction combines the carbon in the organic matter with
the hydrogen from water to form methane, it follows
that for the optimum gas production the ratios of the
raw materials should also be optimum. This is extremely
difficult to quantify because the feedstock can be so
variable. The electrical efficiency of a gasification-based
combined cycle plant is much higher than that of a combustion-based
steam cycle plant of the same scale. Thus a 30MWe state-of-the-art
combustion plant will give an efficiency of 31% whereas
a gasification plant would be capable of 42% efficiency.
3.2
Social Implications
The production
of biofuels can provide numerous local, regional, and
national economic benefits. The growth and conversion
of biomass feedstocks creates jobs for local people
in rural, agriculture-based areas. Because the market
for transportation fuels is large, the widespread use
of biofuels will increase the demand for raw material
and will therefore increase the income for farmers.
Increased demand for feedstock also helps to reduce
the amount of surplus crops and reduces the need for
national farming subsidies. Conversion of the raw material
into fuels also provides economic benefits through the
construction and operation of processing facilities.
These facilities provide local employment and development
opportunities in the rural areas of both developed and
developing countries and can help improve their financial
infrastructure.
As far
as gaseous fuels are concerned, simple anaerobic digesters
are used in rural areas of some developing countries
to produce biogas from manure and crop residues at scales
ranging from household to village. They provide fuel
for cooking and power, by-products in the form of fertiliser
and feed for pigs and fish farms, and substantial environmental
and human health benefits.
3.3
Environmental Implications
Transportation
is a major cause of adverse environmental impacts. Much
of this transportation-caused environmental damage can
be substantially alleviated by substituting biofuels
for fossil fuels or just by using them as fuel additives.
Carbon monoxide emission, for example, is a direct result
of incomplete combustion, which biofuels can reduce
because of the oxygen they contain. Other serious toxins
contained in smog, such as PAN and ground-level ozone,
are the result of a complex reaction triggered by ultraviolet
radiation, but the principal ingredients are carbon
monoxide, hydrocarbons, and nitrogen oxides. Again,
adding biofuels to gasoline or diesel produces more
complete combustion reducing carbon monoxide and unburned
tailpipe hydrocarbon emissions. On the other hand, the
typical 10% blend of ethanol with gasoline is more volatile
than straight gasoline or ethanol (which has very low
volatility), so hydrocarbon evaporation from the fuel
system may be higher with ethanol blends.
Nitrogen
oxide formation increases with combustion temperature,
so NOx production actually goes up slightly with oxygenated
fuels. The overall impact, however, of biofuels use
is to substantially reduce the emission of smog-causing
pollutants. The reduction of these unwanted products
provides local and regional air quality and environmental
benefits, particularly in industrial centres.
In contrast
to other biofuels, biogas shares some of the disadvantages
of fossil fuels in that it produces pollutants when
burned, such as waste gases, some of which are toxic.
These can be reduced by chemical processes before releasing
the remainder into the atmosphere. The quantities involved
are insignificant compared with other sources - although
this would be something to consider if the use of biogas
is to be increased. Carbon dioxide - the greenhouse
gas largely responsible for global warming - is also
released. However, this originates from plants which
have absorbed it from the atmosphere, so no additional
carbon dioxide is involved.